Coincident In-situ and Triple-Frequency Radar Airborne Observations in the Arctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The dataset collected during the Radar Snow Experiment (RadSnowExp) presents the first-ever triple-frequency radar reflectivities combined with almost perfectly co-located and coincident airborne in situ microphysics probes on board the National Research Council Canada (NRC) Convair-580 aircraft. Over 12 hours of flight data in mixed phased and glaciated clouds with more than 3.4 hours in non-Rayleigh regions for at least one of the radar frequencies provide a unique opportunity for studying the relationship between cloud microphysical properties and radar triple-frequency signals. The in situ particle imagery data for this study include imagery from the CPI probe, which provides high resolution particle imagery and allow accurate identification of particle types including level of riming within the DFR plane. The airborne triple-frequency radar data are analysed and grouped based on the dominant particle compositions and microphysical processes (level of aggregation and riming). The results from this study are consistent with the main findings of previous modelling studies with specific regions of the dual-frequency ratio (DFR) plane associated with unique scattering properties of different ice habits, especially in clouds where radar signal is dominated by large aggregates. Moreover, the analysis shows that the close relationships between the triple-frequency signatures and particles’ bulk density, level of riming and aggregations and characteristic size of the particle size distribution (PSD).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".