MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183263592 · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102586

“My son was castrated as a result of a medical error. Is it OK to raise him as a eunuch?”

2021· article· en· W3183263592 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas W. Johnson, Richard J. Wassersug

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Medicine and Surgery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSexual Differentiation and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTestosterone (patch)Face (sociological concept)PediatricsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 12-year-old boy lost both testes after testicular torsion. He is now 14, and his father wants to know if the boy should immediately start supplemental testosterone or if he might reasonably choose to live as a eunuch. The boy does not yet express any strong opinion except that he is embarrassed about his weight gain. We advised the father that there is no need to rush the decision as the boy could at least delay testosterone therapy until his teens or early 20s and still go through male puberty with little risk of adverse health effects. We seek to know if others endorse our endocrinological advice. The boy's father wants to be honest with his son about the social challenges the boy may face if he elects to delay or avoid puberty altogether and chooses to openly identify as a eunuch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Medicine and SurgerySame topicSexual Differentiation and DisordersFrench-language works237,207