MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183373935 · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3097090

Sleep Apnea Detection From Variational Mode Decomposed EEG Signal Using a Hybrid CNN-BiLSTM

2021· article· en· W3183373935 on OpenAlexaff
Tanvir Mahmud, Ishtiaque Ahmed Khan, Talha Ibn Mahmud, Shaikh Anowarul Fattah, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Feature extractionElectroencephalographyArtificial intelligenceSleep apneaConvolutional neural networkKernel (algebra)Sleep StagesArtificial neural networkDeep learningFeature (linguistics)Speech recognitionPolysomnographyMedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep apnea, a severe sleep disorder, is a clinically complicated disease that requires timely diagnosis for proper treatment. In this paper, an automated deep learning-based approach is proposed for the detection of sleep apnea frames from electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Unlike conventional methods of direct feature extraction from EEG signals, the variational mode decomposition (VMD) algorithm is utilized in the proposed method to decompose the EEG signals into a number of modes. Use of such decomposed EEG signals for feature extraction offers efficient processing of the variations introduced in the frequency spectrum during apnea events irrespective of particular patients. Afterward, a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) is proposed to separately extract the temporal features from each VMD mode in parallel while maintaining their temporal dependencies. The FCNN block utilizes causal dilated convolutions with increasing dilation rates along with multiple kernel operations in convolutions. Subsequently, for further exploration of the inter-modal temporal variations, these extracted features from different EEG-modes are jointly optimized with a stack of bi-directional long short term memory (LSTM) layers. Hence, the trained and optimized network is capable of generating predictions of apnea frames during the evaluation phase. Contrary to other studies, this study is carried out in a subject independent manner where separate subjects are considered for training and testing. Additionally, a semi-supervised approach is explored where for facilitating better classification performance on a subject's frames, a small portion of the patient's data is included in training to leverage insight regarding the possible environmental variations. Extensive experimentations on three publicly available datasets provide average accuracy of 93.22%, 93.25% and 89.41% in the subject-independent cross-validation scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207