MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183376472 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3097053

Joint Virtual Network Topology Design and Embedding for Cybertwin-Enabled 6G Core Networks

2021· article· en· W3183376472 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersBeijing Municipal Natural Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork virtualizationVirtual networkScalabilityDistributed computingNetwork topologyHeuristicNetwork architectureNetwork packetComputer networkVirtualizationCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To efficiently allocate heterogeneous resources for customized services, in this article, we propose a network virtualization (NV)-based network architecture in cybertwin-enabled 6G core networks. In particular, we investigate how to optimize the virtual network (VN) topology (which consists of several virtual nodes and a set of intermediate virtual links) and determine the resultant VN embedding in a joint way over a cybertwin-enabled substrate network. To this end, we formulate an optimization problem whose objective is to minimize the embedding cost, while ensuring that the end-to-end (E2E) packet delay requirements are satisfied. The queueing network theory is utilized to evaluate each service’s E2E packet delay, which is a function of the resources assigned to the virtual nodes and virtual links for the embedded VN. We reveal that the problem under consideration is formally a mixed-integer nonlinear program (MINLP) and propose an improved brute-force search algorithm to find its optimal solutions. To enhance the algorithm’s scalability and reduce the computational complexity, we further propose an adaptively weighted heuristic algorithm to obtain near-optimal solutions to the problem for large-scale networks. Simulations are conducted to show that the proposed algorithms can effectively improve network performance compared to other benchmark algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score0.881

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it