MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183382752 · doi:10.1080/16843703.2021.1930344

Optimal economic statistical design of adaptive attribute control charts for monitoring three level products

2021· article· en· W3183382752 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality Technology & Quantitative Management · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl chartComputer scienceShewhart individuals control chartStatistical process controlSensitivity (control systems)Product (mathematics)Control (management)Quality (philosophy)Data miningPerspective (graphical)Design of experimentsStatisticsEWMA chartProcess (computing)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three level control charts are used to monitor processes, where the quality of products is characterized by classifying the product characteristic into three discrete levels. Recent studies have approved the advantages of using adaptive schemes rather than static one in monitoring such processes. In this paper, we develop adaptive control charts for monitoring three level products from an economic statistical perspective. Using numerical examples, we illustrate the performance of the proposed models. A sensitivity analysis is also carried out to investigate the effects of model parameters on the solution of the economic design by using the design of experiments (DOE) technique and multiple linear regression analysis method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.430
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.054 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it