Diplomacy Review of Delegation of Republic of Indonesia to the International Civil Aviation Organization in Montreal Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) is an important institution that mandates the world's civil aviation authorities to play a role in reforming Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) of civil aviation. SARPs are the main reference for all parties related to the issue of international civil aviation. Indonesia's relationship and cooperation with the ICAO is therefore, important and should be a priority. ICAO is an organization where Indonesia is able to protect and defend its national interests. Relations and cooperation with ICAO are priorities in order to help and improve Indonesian civil aviation safety and security. This study was based on observations made by the Permanent Delegation of Republic of Indonesia on the diplomatic role played in ICAO during 2020 by studying the latest aspects of ICAO governing bodies, development of specific issues, pending issues and follow-up of Indonesia diplomatic role in ICAO. In general, the aim of the diplomatic role in ICAO is focused on supporting the achievement of three items; 1) securing Indonesia's national interest in international civil aviation cooperation; 2) support international civil aviation programs and issues that are ICAO's priority; and 3) improve Indonesia's position in ICAO, especially in order to prepare for Indonesia's candidacy to the ICAO Council.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".