An Optimal Transport-Embedded Similarity Measure for Diagnostic Knowledge Transferability Analytics Across Machines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The successful applications of deep transfer learning to intelligent fault diagnosis testify to a positive correlation between transferable feature similarity and knowledge transferability across diagnostic tasks. This correlation makes feature similarity possible to assess diagnostic knowledge transferability. Therefore, researchers have attempted various measures for feature similarity, and distance metrics have been adopted as an objective measure for feature distribution discrepancy. However, the commonly used distance metrics cannot address the joint distribution discrepancy (JDD) due to the difficulty in fitting conditional distributions of target domain samples. To overcome the problem, we resort to explore cluster-conditional distributions instead and propose an optimal transport-embedded joint distribution similarity measure (OT-JDSM) that is implemented in two steps. First, a cluster-true label propagation spreads labels from a small number of labeled target domain samples to the whole. Second, the JDD of transferable features is produced via an efficient solution of optimal transport. OT-JDSM is demonstrated on synthetic examples and 144 transfer diagnosis tasks that are created by public and private bearing datasets. The results show that OT-JDSM of transferable features has a stronger correlation with diagnostic knowledge transferability than other distance metrics. Moreover, the OT-JDSM gain can quantify the transfer performance of diagnostic models on tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it