MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183474097 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00227-8

Coming to terms with COVID-19 personally and professionally in Bangladesh

2021· article· en· W3183474097 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Senjuti Saha

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingPrivilege (computing)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineCLARITYPsychologySocial psychologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As I put together the last few slides for a Zoom seminar in Canada while sitting in a room in Bangladesh, I felt feverish. I took 400 mg of paracetamol, blaming it on the exhaustion of giving talks at odd hours, and little proper sleep. It was late March, 2021, and COVID-19 cases had started to rise in Bangladesh again, which meant more guidelines to keep my hospital team safe, more testing for my laboratory team, more genomic sequencing, and also more infections within the teams. The stress was beginning to accumulate, just like it had in March, 2020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207