MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183525357 · doi:10.1002/celc.202100769

Blocky Sb/C Anodes with Enhanced Diffusion Kinetics for High‐Rate and Ultra‐Long Cyclability Sodium Dual‐Ion Batteries

2021· article· en· W3183525357 on OpenAlexaff
Hong‐Ji Li, Jingjing Li, Zhe Chen, Zhenzhen Wang, Jin Qu, Yi‐Qian Chen, Lijun Zhu, Fei Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemElectroChem · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsInternational Development Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodeMaterials scienceElectrochemistryGrapheneChemical engineeringDiffusionAntimonyKineticsIonComposite numberCurrent densityCarbon fibersNanotechnologyElectrodeChemistryComposite materialMetallurgyThermodynamicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sodium ion‐based dual ion batteries (SDIBs) have attracted increasing attentions for their high operative voltages and low cost, but their poor long‐term cycling stability and rate capability largely hinder their practical applications. Here, an optimized anode‐antimony/carbon/graphene (Sb/C/G) composite for SDIBs is designed. Sb nanoparticles (NPs) not only can enhance the specific capacity but also facilitate the Na+ diffusion kinetics. The continuous conductive carbon matrix can promote the electron transfer process and accommodate volume changes of Sb NPs during sodiation/desodiation. Therefore, superior electrochemical performance, for example, a high discharge capacity of 376 mA h g−1 with a higher ICE (69.1 %) at current density of 500 mA g−1, an excellent cycling stability (73 mA h g−1 is retained even after 1400 cycles at current density of 1000 mA g−1), and high stable CE of 99.0 %. Our study offers a suitable design for Na+‐based batteries anode structure and accelerates their practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemElectroChemSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207