MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183553248 · doi:10.25071/2561-5467.57

Rear Admiral Henry John May and Fred Jane’s 1898 Naval War Game / Rules for the Jane Naval War Game

2021· article· fr· W3183553248 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Northern Mariner / Le marin du nord · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSpanish Civil WarArtPolitical scienceSociologyArt historyHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1898, Fred T. Jane a commercialisé un jeu de guerre naval populaire destiné aux officiers de marine professionnels et aux embres du grand public qui s’intéressaient à la marine. Afin de rendre son jeu de table aussi réaliste que possible, Jane a demandé les conseils et l’aide de particuliers œuvrant au sein des établissements de la Marine de plusieurs pays. La présente note de recherche sauve de l’oubli le jeu de guerre naval original de Jane ainsi que le rôle joué par Henry J. May dans la promotion des interactions intellectuelles entre les officiers de marine professionnels et les experts civils bien renseignés, tels que Fred Jane et l’historien Julian Corbett, dans les domaines de la stratégie et des tactiques navales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it