El sindicalismo canadiense ante el Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
this article provides an overview of Canada’s largest labour organization,and observations on the positions it adopted in response to the free trade accords Canada entered into with the United States and Mexico. While unionists are critical of the way in which the enormous socioeconomic Canagap separating Mexico and Canada led to a downward harmonization of the working conditions of their members, known popularly as the “Mexican experience”, they aspire to a global free trade in which the benefits of economic growth are shared so that all citizens of the Americas enjoy prosperity and democracy. The Canadian Labour Congress warns that some key sectors of their country’s economy have become so integrated into that of the United States that a possible return to pre-free trade protectionist rules could produce grave breakdown effects. Although they consider it desirable to maintain good jobs in Canada, they recognize that international trade is important to the Canadian economy in that it provides economies of scale and scope. They aspire more to Canada regaining control over its economic development than to a reversion to the productive self-sufficiency practices of the past. However, we do not know what will happen to Nafta given the ultra nationalist policies of president Trump.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".