MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183681943 · doi:10.1079/dfb/20193504670

<i>Saccobolus citrinus</i> . [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].

2019· article· en· W3183681943 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. W. Minter, P. F. Cannon

Bibliographic record

VenueDescriptions of Fungi and Bacteria · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyTanzaniaBiological dispersalEnvironmental protectionForestryDistribution (mathematics)PopulationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A description is provided for Saccobolus citrinus , which is often detected only following moist chamber incubation of dung. Some information on its habitat, dispersal and transmission, and conservation status is given, along with details of its geographical distribution (Africa (Egypt, Kenya, Tanzania), North America (Canada (Ontario), USA (Oklahoma, Wisconsin)), Central America (Costa Rica), South America (Argentina, Brazil (Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Sul), Chile, Venezuela), Asia (Armenia, India, Israel, Malaysia, Oman, Taiwan, Thailand), Atlantic Ocean (Portugal (Azores), Spain (Canary Islands)), Australasia (Australia (Queensland, Victoria, Western Australia), New Zealand), Caribbean (Dominica, Guadeloupe, Puerto Rico), Europe (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia (Kursk Oblast, Leningrad Oblast), Serbia, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, UK)). No evaluation has been made of any possible positive economic impact of this fungus (e.g. as a recycler, as a source of useful products, as a provider of checks and balances within its ecosystem, etc.). No reports of negative economic impacts have been found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDescriptions of Fungi and BacteriaSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207