Association of dexmedetomidine with recovery room and hospital discharge times: A retrospective cohort analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Dexmedetomidine is a useful anesthetic adjunct, increasingly popular during pediatric surgery and procedural sedation. Its half‐life of 2–3 hours might prolong recovery and discharge times when compared with an un‐supplemented propofol anesthetic. This may create an additional burden in a busy post‐anesthetic care unit (PACU). Aim To investigate whether intraoperative adjuvant dexmedetomidine delays PACU discharge in patients undergoing propofol anesthesia for day surgery or procedural investigations with minimal anticipated post‐procedural pain. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of outpatient procedures performed during a six‐month period including pediatric patients, ASA physical status I‐III, who underwent intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), strabismus repair, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, or combined upper/lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients receiving a sedative premedication, long‐acting opioids, or volatile anesthetics for maintenance of anesthesia, were excluded. Duration of PACU stay was compared for patients who did or did not receive intraoperative dexmedetomidine in the four procedure groups. Results Charts were reviewed for 359 patients; 130 (36%) received dexmedetomidine. Median differences in duration of PACU stay for dexmedetomidine versus non‐dexmedetomidine cases were: 5 minutes (95%CI 0 to 10, p =0.037) for MRI; 5 minutes (95%CI −3 to 15, p =0.258) for strabismus surgery; 7 minutes (95%CI 3 to 10, p <0.001) for upper endoscopy; and 5 minutes (95%CI 1 to 12, p =0.021) for combined upper/lower endoscopy. Linear regression (F=61.1, adjusted R 2 =0.40) indicated a significant relationship between dexmedetomidine dose (estimate 14.6 minutes per μg/kg, 95%CI 8.2 to 21.1, p <0.001) and duration of PACU stay. Conclusion We found evidence for a small association of intraoperative dexmedetomidine with duration of recovery from propofol anesthesia for a set of common outpatient procedures, with a potential dose relationship equivalent to approximately 15 minutes delay per μg/kg dexmedetomidine administered. Future research into the benefits of dexmedetomidine in pediatric anesthesia should further evaluate this relationship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".