MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Genetic deletion of mu opioid receptors from Kölliker‐Fuse neurons reduces morphine‐induced respiratory depression

2017· article· en· W3183689042 on OpenAlexaff
Erica S. Levitt, John M. Bissonnette, Brigitte Kieffer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsOpioidReceptorMorphineμ-opioid receptorAgonistRespiratory systemPharmacologyRespiratory rateOpioid receptorChemistryEndocrinologyPopulationInternal medicineMedicineAnesthesiaHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Activation of mu opioid receptors in the pontine Kölliker‐Fuse (KF) causes a reduction in respiratory rate in anesthetized rats. We have previously shown that mu opioid agonists hyperpolarize a population of KF neurons (Levitt et al., J Physiol , 2015). The goal of these experiments was to determine the contribution of the opioid‐sensitive KF neurons to the reduction in respiratory rate caused by systemic administration of the opioid agonist morphine. Targeted deletion of mu opioid receptors was accomplished by viral expression of Cre recombinase in the KF of mice with floxed mu opioid receptors. Experiments were performed 4– 6 weeks later. In whole‐cell recordings from brain slices, infected KF neurons were no longer hyperpolarized by opioid agonist, confirming deletion of mu opioid receptors. Head‐out plethysmography was used to measure respiratory rate. Morphine (10 mg/kg, ip) caused a significantly smaller reduction in respiratory rate in mice with bilateral deletion of mu opioid receptors from KF, compared to uninjected or GFP injected controls. The time‐course for the effect of morphine was also delayed in mice lacking mu receptors in KF neurons. Thus, opioid‐sensitive KF neurons contribute to, but are not entirely responsible for, systemic morphine‐induced respiratory depression. Support or Funding Information NIH K99/R00 DA038069

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→