MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183698976 · doi:10.1353/gss.2021.0011

Africapitalism: Rethinking the Role of Business in Africa ed. by Kenneth Amaeshi, Adun Okupe and Uwafiokun Idemudia

2021· article· en· W3183698976 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew C. Kolasa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of global south studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEconomic Growth and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobeColonialismCompetition (biology)IndustrialisationSociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Africapitalism: Rethinking the Role of Business in Africa ed. by Kenneth Amaeshi, Adun Okupe and Uwafiokun Idemudia Matthew C. Kolasa Amaeshi, Kenneth, Adun Okupe, and Uwafiokun Idemudia, eds. Africapitalism: Rethinking the Role of Business in Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018. In Africapitalism: Rethinking the Role of Business in Africa, editors Kenneth Amaeshi and Adun Okupe, at the University of Edinburgh, and Uwafiokun Idemudia, at York University in Toronto, support the new economic philosophy of Africapitalism (a term coined by Nigerian economist Tony Elumelu, who wrote the book’s foreword). Attesting to the relevance of Elumelu’s contributions and ideas, Time magazine named him one of the world’s one hundred most influential people in 2020. This creative and well-written interdisciplinary collection of eleven essays brings African voices from around the globe to the fore. Africapitalism, a uniquely African approach to developing economies, involves the interconnectivity of stakeholders, social welfare, and communities. It seeks to maximize profits while improving employee, consumer, and national outcomes with a sense of community and patriotism. The authors begin by assessing African economies. Underdeveloped institutions and industrialization pose a problem as developed countries enjoy distinctive advantages. Combine this with the stunting effects of extractive exploitation and colonialism and the odds are against African economies. Meanwhile, the well-meaning international development community fosters aid dependence. The authors posit while parts of Africa have nurtured capitalist classes and growth, competition from capitalist metropoles necessitate a new approach. Enter the new paradigm of Africapitalism. The authors argue that entrepreneurs must take the lead by bringing South Africa’s Ubuntu philosophy to business, introducing principles of progress, prosperity, parity, peace, and place. Africapitalism critiques crony capitalism and corruption in [End Page 220] favor of longer-term views of building society, workforce, and market. Far from a social inevitability, they argue leaders can mold capitalism’s character. The attempt to bring this Africa-centered approach to business is ambitious. In many areas, regulation has proven more convincing than patriotism, but one can work with the other, as fighting corruption can combine with a business strategy and grow into a deep-rooted indigenous variety of capitalism and management. An especially compelling chapter is Amon Chizema and Nceku Nyathi’s discussion of Chinese investment in Africa. As overcapacity and market saturation at home bring Chinese businesspeople to Africa seeking resources and low-cost opportunities, results are mixed. Chizema and Nyathi note while some welcome Chinese no-strings-attached investment as a sign of respect, others question whether this reflects Africapitalism or mere business calculus. Chinese enterprises hire majorities of local laborers but managers and specialists hail from China. While Asian development states deftly required local co-ownership and technology transfers to accompany FDI, African governments seldom make such requirements. The treatment of China in Africa is more nuanced than alarmist warnings or fawningly laudatory reports that typify the topic. Other chapters show the dynamism of Africapitalism. Lyal White and Adrian Kitimbo provide a case study in “Good African Coffee: Adding Value and Driving Community Development in Uganda.” Significantly, the authors explain why so few businesses like it exist. Challenges seem insurmountable: cost of entry, access to credit, skilled labor, infrastructure, limited overseas connections, and stereotypical suspicion of African businesses plagued the project. Given these difficulties, the book’s thesis would be more convincing if it could provide more case studies highlighting the success of Africapitalism. Stella Nkomo puts Africapitalism in context in the last chapter. She acknowledges Africapitalism is more pre-paradigmatic ideology than mature theory. Nkomo predicts the path forward will not be easy as homegrown change requires asking “how to create something new, unfettered from what has always been positioned as the universal” (276). While the authors emphasize the diversity of sub-Saharan Africa and the need to look at different regions differently, the book nonetheless opens itself to criticism. Africapitalism has parallels in earlier continent-wide movements like African socialism. Africapitalism relies on Ubuntu, an influential South [End Page 221] African philosophy, but the authors assume Ubuntu applies across Africa. Can one approach apply to Nigeria and Malawi? Future research must assess Afri-capitalism’s generalizability. Although the book leaves questions unanswered, that is the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of global south studiesSame topicEconomic Growth and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207