MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183855485 · doi:10.1159/000518351

Mapping Angiopoietin1 Expression in the Developing and Adult Brain

2021· article· en· W3183855485 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Wei, Selin Jessa, Claudia L. Kleinman, Timothy N. Phoenix

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Neuroscience · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyNeuroscienceCell biologyCytoarchitecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiopoietin1 (Angpt1) is a secreted protein that activates the endothelial Tie2 receptor. Angpt1 plays a critical role in cardiac development and vascular remodeling in response to disease or injury and shows cell type-restricted expression in the lung, eye, and hematopoietic system. However, the expression of Angpt1 in the developing and adult brain is not known. Here, we employ Angpt1-GFP knock-in reporter mice and a systematic analysis of multiple single-cell RNA sequencing datasets to map the expression of Angpt1 during brain development and adulthood. In the developing brain, Angpt1 displays specific spatiotemporal patterns, with strong expression in cerebellar GABA interneuron progenitors and, to a lower level, in glial progenitor and astrocyte lineages. In the adult brain, on the other hand, we show that neurons are the main source of Angpt1 in the cerebrum, while in the cerebellum, expression is mostly restricted to astrocytes. Together, our data provide clarity on the cell types that express Angpt1 in the developing and adult brain and can be utilized to guide future studies, examining Angpt1 function in brain development, homeostasis, and pathological conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental NeuroscienceSame topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207