MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183856934 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.06.174

Insights from a qualitative analysis of a gene expression model with delays

2021· article· en· W3183856934 on OpenAlexaff
Hakkı Ulaş Ünal, Marc R. Roussel, Islam Boussaada, Silviu‐Iulian Niculescu

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStability (learning theory)Translation (biology)Expression (computer science)Substrate (aquarium)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceMathematicsBiological systemChemistryControl (management)GeneBiologyMessenger RNABiochemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delays appear in the dynamics of many systems due to non-vanishing reaction times of control systems. In biochemical systems, long sequences of repeated steps, especially in biopolymerization processes, can be modeled by delays. However, modelling systems with delays is often complicated by physical constraints, such as the requirement that solutions representing concentrations of chemical species remain positive. In this work, we consider a model for a detoxifying enzyme whose synthesis is controlled by its substrate. The model includes binding-site clearance delays, caused by the time required for an RNA polymerase or ribosome to clear its binding site before another such machine can bind. The existence of a positive equilibrium and the positivity and boundedness of solutions of the corresponding delay-differential equations are proven. In addition, the stability of the model is studied using the “small-gain” theorem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207