MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183886099 · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2021.102080

The Lake Erie HABs Grab: A binational collaboration to characterize the western basin cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms at an unprecedented high-resolution spatial scale

2021· article· en· W3183886099 on OpenAlexaff
Justin D. Chaffin, John F. Bratton, Edward M. Verhamme, Halli B. Bair, Amber A. Beecher, Caren E. Binding, Johnna A. Birbeck, Thomas B. Bridgeman, Xuexiu Chang, Jill Crossman, Warren J. S. Currie, Timothy W. Davis, Gregory J. Dick, Kenneth G. Drouillard, Reagan M. Errera, Thijs Frenken, Hugh J. MacIsaac, Andrew McClure, R. Michael L. McKay, Laura A. Reitz, Jorge W. Santo Domingo, Keara Stanislawczyk, Richard P. Stumpf, Zachary D. Swan, Brenda K. Snyder, Judy A. Westrick, Pengfei Xue, Colleen E. Yancey, Arthur Zastepa, Xing Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueHarmful Algae · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorFisheries and Oceans CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesOhio State UniversityCenter for Sponsored Coastal Ocean ResearchNational Science FoundationNational Institutes of HealthBowling Green State UniversityU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsChlorophyll aAlgal bloomEnvironmental scienceBloomMicrocystisMicrocystinEutrophicationBiogeochemical cycleChlorophyllNutrientBiomass (ecology)OceanographyCyanobacteriaHydrology (agriculture)PhytoplanktonEcologyBiologyGeologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHarmful AlgaeSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207