Boulder-strewn flats in a high-latitude macrotidal embayment, Baffin Island: geomorphology, formation, and future stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tidal flats are widely distributed on high-latitude coasts, where sea ice processes have been invoked to explain the abundance and distribution of boulders. This study documents the surface morphology and sediment dynamics of a Low-Arctic macrotidal system, the boulder-rich tidal flats of Koojesse Inlet, fronting the Nunavut capital, Iqaluit, on Baffin Island. This is a region of postglacial isostatic uplift and forced regression, with raised littoral, deltaic, and glaciomarine deposits. The spring-tidal range is 11.1 m and sea ice cover lasts roughly 9 months of the year. The extensive intertidal flats are up to 1 km wide, with a veneer of sand and gravel (including large boulders) resting on an erosional unconformity truncating the underlying glaciomarine mud, forming a terrace within the present tidal range. Over a 3-year study, no consistent pattern of erosion or deposition was evident. Over a longer time scale, the concave hypsometry, low sediment supply, slight ebb dominance of weak tidal currents, abrasion by wave-entrained sand, ebb-oriented ripples formed under subaerial drainage, and slumps on the terrace flanks are consistent with seaward hydraulic and gravitational sediment transport. These processes may be of greater importance than shoreward ice transport. This study underlines the importance of relict glaciomarine deposits, postglacial uplift, and falling relative sea level in the erosional development of these high-latitude tidal flats. Relative sea-level projections for Iqaluit are ambiguous, but a switch to rising sea level, if it occurs, combined with more open water and wave energy, could alter the foreshore dynamics of the system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".