MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3183915173 · doi:10.23952/jnva.4.2020.1.09

Contingent derivatives of the set-valued solution map of a noncoercive saddle point problem. A cross-fertilization between variational analysis and inverse problems

2020· article· en· W3183915173 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Baasansuren Jadamba, Akhtar A. Khan, Miguel Sama, Christiane Tammer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundUniversidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSaddle pointSaddleInverseMathematicsApplied mathematicsSet (abstract data type)Inverse problemPoint (geometry)Human fertilizationMathematical economicsMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We focus on the inverse problem of parameter identification in an abstract saddle point problem. Under the assumption that the saddle point problem is solvable, we study the characterizations of the first-order and the second-order contingent derivatives of the set-valued parameter-to-solution map.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational AnalysisSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207