Modeling Vessel Behaviours by Clustering AIS Data Using Optimized DBSCAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today, maritime transportation represents a substantial portion of international trade. Sustainable development of marine transportation requires systematic modeling and surveillance for maritime situational awareness. In this paper, we present an enhanced density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) method to model vessel behaviours based on trajectory point data. The proposed methodology enhances the DBSCAN clustering performance by integrating the Mahalanobis distance metric, which considers the correlation between the points representing vessel locations. This research proposes applying the clustering method to historical Automatic Identification System (AIS) data using an algorithm to generate a clustering model of the vessels’ trajectories and a model for detecting vessel trajectory anomalies, such as unexpected stops, deviations from regulated routes, or inconsistent speed. Further, an automatic and data-driven approach is proposed to select the initial parameters for the enhanced DBSCAN approach. Results are presented from two case studies using an openly available Gulf of Mexico AIS dataset as well as a Saint Lawrence Seaway and Great Lakes AIS licensed dataset acquired from ORBCOMM (a maritime AIS data provider). These research findings demonstrate the applicability and scalability of the proposed method for modeling more water regions, contributing to situational awareness, vessel collision prevention, safe navigation, route planning, and detection of vessel behaviour anomalies for auto-vessel development towards the sustainability of marine transportation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".