A Hybrid Capsule Network for Pneumonia Detection Using Image Augmentation Based on Generative Adversarial Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pneumonia, featured by inflammation of the air sacs in one or both lungs, is usually detected by examining chest X-ray images. This paper probes into the classification models that can distinguish between normal and pneumonia images. As is known, trained networks like AlexNet and GoogleNet are deep network architectures, which are widely adopted to solve many classification problems. They have been adapted to the target datasets, and employed to classify new data generated through transfer learning. However, the classical architectures are not accurate enough for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Therefore, this paper designs a capsule network with high discrimination capability, and trains the network on Kaggle’s online pneumonia dataset, which contains chest X-ray images of many adults and children. The original dataset consists of 1,583 normal images, and 4,273 pneumonia images. Then, two data augmentation approaches were applied to the dataset, and their effects on classification accuracy were compared in details. The model parameters were optimized through five different experiments. The results show that the highest classification accuracy (93.91% even on small images) was achieved by the capsule network, coupled with data augmentation by generative adversarial network (GAN), using optimized parameters. This network outperformed the classical strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".