Impact of Membrane Resistance on Width and Amplitude of Spikes in Different Injected Currents in One Spiking Neural Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neurons in the brain as the elementary processing units and nervous system play a key role. If a neuron gets a proper stimulus, it produces action potentials (spikes) that are transferred along its axon. Reaching the end of the neuron, other neurons or muscle cells may be activated [1]. The effect of neural morphology along with thickness of dendrites and passive electrical parameters on the spikes width and amplitude can be investigated by analytical and numerical investigations of spiking models. The impact of mentioned proper stimulus may be degraded by passing time. In this paper, it is tried to add the effective parameter ’membrane resistance’ in well-known Hodgkin-Huxley model with four dimensions to compare several outputs due to changing resistance and various injected current. The goal of this paper has been to measure spikes changes or even how to determine current threshold when resistance is not constant (non-linear time dependant) result of different factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it