MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3184049676 · doi:10.33612/diss.173751374

Dynamics and observational signatures from multi-field inflation

2021· dissertation· en· W3184049676 on OpenAlexaff
Perseas Christodoulidis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttractorField (mathematics)Statistical physicsInflation (cosmology)ObservableScalingUniversality (dynamical systems)Stability (learning theory)Theoretical physicsPhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter offers a non-technical introduction to modern cosmology with emphasis on the cosmological milestones of the last century.We also provide an outline of the thesis and set the notation.1 Expansion of the UniverseAround 1920, a "Great Debate" took place amongst astronomers regarding the size of the universe [12].On one side, astronomers such as H. Shapley argued for a small universe of the size of the Milky Way, while the opposing side represented by H. Curtis claimed that distant nebulae were distinct galaxies located at large distances from Earth.The debate was finally settled by E. Hubble in 1927 [13].Analysing data from stars with variable luminosity, known as Cepheid stars, of what appeared to be distant nebula enabled him to perform a cosmic distance calibration, that is a way to measure distances of distant objects.Those objects were shown to lie outside of our galaxy and therefore settled the Great Debate.Combining the previous results with redshift measurements of various galaxies led to his famous law relating distance to velocity.This relation had already been proposed by G. Lemaître as a solution of an expanding universe.Distant galaxies appeared to recede from us with a velocity proportional to their distance which implied that the universe is expanding.A few decades later, A. Penzias and R. Wilson accidentally discovered a mysterious radiation in the microwave part of the spectrum that was coming from every part of the sky.The existence of this radiation was already predicted by G. Gamow in 1948 as the afterglow of the Big Bang and for this reason it became known as the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation [14].Being one of the key predictions of the expanding universe, the Big Bang scenario was established in the cosmological community.Up to the end of the 20 th century, the dominant view included a cold universe whose average density of matter would determine its fate; a densely enough universe would recollapse in the future leading to the "Big Crunch", whereas if its density was lower than a critical value it would expand forever, leading to the "Big Chill".In any case, the expansion of the universe would decelerate because it would be subject only to gravitational forces of attractive nature.The situation changed in 1998 due to the first direct evidence for cosmic acceleration.S. Perlmutter, from the Supernova Cosmology Project, and B. P. Schmidt and A. G. Riess, from the High-Z Supernova Search Team, analysed data from supernovae type Ia that enabled them to measure distances in the universe, in a similar fashion to what E. Hubble had done in the past [15,16].These observations indicated that universe's expansion is accelerating and, hence, the universe should be filled with an unknown form of energy dubbed dark energy.In the simplest scenario, dark energy is represented by a cosmological constant and is associated with the energy of • Chapter 6 presents two-field scaling solutions for a generic field geometry.We perform a detailed stability analysis and use several examples to highlight the stability criteria.• In Chapter 7 we propose a classification scheme of various models in the literature based on the number of critical points of an effective potential.We also discuss the connection between hyperinflation and sidetracked inflation.• In Chapter 8 we are interested in the limit of infinite fields.We use the horizon-crossing approximation to investigate the universality and prior dependence of predictions.• Finally, in Chapter 9 we summarize our main findings. Notation• Throughout this thesis we will work in natural units = c = 1.After Ch. 3 we will also set M pl = 1.• Primes ( ) and dots (˙) refer to derivatives with respect to the number of e-folds (N) and the cosmic time (t) respectively.• The e-folding number will be negative during the inflationary stage and zero at the end of inflation.• Greek letters (µ, ν, • • • ) denote spacetime indices and Latin letters (a, b, • • • ) field-metric indices.• From Ch. 4 onwards G ij and R will refer to the metric and the Ricci scalar associated with the field space.• Partial derivatives with respect to spacetime indices will be represented by commas ( ,a ≡ ∂/∂x a ) and covariant derivatives with semicolons ( ;a ).• The nabla operator (∇) acts on Euclidean 3-vectors or 3 × 3 tensors (e.g.∇f ( x) ≡ ∂ i f and ∇ • A ≡ ∂ i A i ) .• Up to (and including) Ch. 3 Ω will denote the normalized fluid components, whereas from Ch. 4 onwards it will refer to the turn rate of multi-field models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCosmology and Gravitation Theories→French-language works237,207→