MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184066767 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.1119

High-frequency instabilities of Stokes waves

2022· preprint· en· W3184066767 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Creedon, Bernard Deconinck, Olga Trichtchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Waves and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInviscid flowPhysicsConservative vector fieldEuler equationsCompressibilityLinearizationAmplitudeMathematical analysisPerturbation (astronomy)Gravity waveComputationClassical mechanicsEuler's formulaMathematicsMechanicsWave propagationNonlinear systemOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Euler's equations govern the behaviour of gravity waves on the surface of an incompressible, inviscid and irrotational fluid of arbitrary depth. We investigate the spectral stability of sufficiently small-amplitude, one-dimensional Stokes waves, i.e. periodic gravity waves of permanent form and constant velocity, in both finite and infinite depth. We develop a perturbation method to describe the first few high-frequency instabilities away from the origin, present in the spectrum of the linearization about the small-amplitude Stokes waves. Asymptotic and numerical computations of these instabilities are compared for the first time, with excellent agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicOcean Waves and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207