MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184088554 · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac157a

Absence of Bursts between 4 and 8 GHz from FRB 20200120E Located in an M81 Globular Cluster

2021· article· en· W3184088554 on OpenAlexaff
Vishal Gajjar, Daniele Michilli, Jakob T. Faber, Sabrina Berger, S. Croft, Aaron B. Pearlman, Ketan R. Sand, Paul Scholz, Andrew Siemion

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Notes of the AAS · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobular clusterPhysicsAstrophysicsScintillationTelescopeCluster (spacecraft)AstronomyOpticsStarsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the non-detection of dispersed bursts between 4 and 8 GHz from 2.5 hr of observations of FRB 20200120E at 6 GHz using the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope. Our fluence limits are several times lower than the average burst fluences reported at 600 and 1400 MHz. We conclude that these non-detections are either due to high-frequency bursts being weaker and/or scintillation-induced modulated. It is also likely that our observations were non-concurrent with any activity window of FRB 20200120E.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Notes of the AASSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207