MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184147053 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20114058

Private Feedlot Industry Company’s Journey Related to Recognized Animal Care and Welfare Standards

2011· article· en· W3184147053 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sherry J. Hannon, Calvin W. Booker, Tamara Hancock, Kris Rogers, R. Kent Fenton, G. Kee Jim

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeedlotBusinessAnimal healthAnimal welfareProduct (mathematics)WelfareAnimal productionMarketingAgricultural scienceOperations managementEngineeringVeterinary medicineMedicineEconomicsGeographyAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feedlot Health Management Services Ltd. (FHMS) is a private industry company providing animal health management, nutrition, and production consulting services, as well as individual animal data collection and management tools, to commercial feedlots in Canada and the United States. FHMS has conducted feedlot research for commercial feedlot producers and the global feedlot industry for over 25 years, and conducts over 50 studies annually, including disease investigations; new technology assessments; product safety, efficacy and licensing studies; pathogen and antimicrobial resistance surveillance; individual animal and small pen research pilot studies; and large pen commercial field trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0090.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207