MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184178553 · doi:10.1155/2021/8947789

Diagnosis and Treatment Effect of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Magnetic Resonance Image Features on Severe Stroke and Mental State

2021· article· en· W3184178553 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueContrast Media & Molecular Imaging · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConditional random fieldConvolutional neural networkMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMagnetic resonance imagingStroke (engine)SegmentationMedicineSørensen–Dice coefficientImage segmentationInternal medicineAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceCognitive impairmentDiseaseComputer scienceRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image features based on convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm and conditional random field on the diagnosis and mental state of patients with severe stroke. 208 patients with severe stroke who all received MRI examination were recruited as the research objects. According to cerebral small vascular disease (CSVD) score, the patients were divided into CSVD 0∼4 groups. The patients who completed the three-month follow-up were classified into cognitive impairment group (124 cases) and the noncognitive impairment group (84 cases) according to the cut-off point of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MOCA) scale score of 26. A novel image segmentation algorithm was proposed based on U-shaped fully CNN (U-Net) and conditional random field, which was compared with the fully CNN (FCN) algorithm and U-Net algorithm, and was applied to the MRI segmentation training of patients with severe stroke. It was found that the average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) (3.13 ± 1.35), Hoffman distance (HD) (28.71 ± 9.05), Dice coefficient (0.78 ± 1.35), accuracy (0.74 ± 0.11), and sensitivity (0.85 ± 0.13) of the proposed algorithm were superior to those of FCN algorithm and U-Net algorithm. There were significant differences in the MOCA scores among the five groups of patients from CSVD 0 to CSVD 4 in the three time periods (0, 1, and 3 months) ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>P</a:mi> <a:mo>&lt;</a:mo> <a:mn>0.05</a:mn> </a:math> ). Differences in cerebral microhemorrhage (CMB), perivascular space (PVS), and number of cavities, Fazekas, and total CSVD scores between the two groups were significant ( <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>P</c:mi> <c:mo>&lt;</c:mo> <c:mn>0.05</c:mn> </c:math> ). Multivariate regression found that the number of PVS, white matter hyperintensity (WMH) Fazekas, and total CSVD score were independent factors of cognitive impairment. In short, MRI images based on deep learning image segmentation algorithm had good application value for clinical diagnosis and treatment of stroke and can effectively improve the detection effect of brain domain characteristics and psychological state of patients after stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it