MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184318135 · doi:10.18280/ts.380331

Analysis of Classroom Learning Behaviors Based on Internet of Things and Image Processing

2021· article· en· W3184318135 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Education of Liaoning Province
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer scienceThe InternetMultimediaImage processingImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceInternet privacyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quick and accurate identification of classroom emotions helps teachers perceive the learning state of their students. This paper designs a bimodal identification system for classroom emotions based on electroencephalogram (EEG) signals and countenances. The system relies on the Internet of things (IoT) technology to collect EEG signals, and extracts the signal features with fractal dimension and multiscale entropy algorithm. After that, the support vector machine (SVM) was adopted to classify the classroom emotions. Then, the features of countenances were extracted by local binary pattern (LBP). Experimental results show that our system accurately identified 85.7% of classroom emotions. Compared with the traditional countenance-based emotion identification method, the bimodal approach could extract rich information on classroom emotions, and achieve a good effect on emotion identification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it