MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184330098 · doi:10.1002/cnm.3515

An inverse technique to identify participant‐specific bone adaptation from serial <scp>CT</scp> measurements

2021· article· en· W3184330098 on OpenAlex
Tannis D. Kemp, Bryce A. Besler, Steven K. Boyd

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSolverCurvatureInverse problemComputer scienceInverseAlgorithmSensitivity (control systems)Artificial intelligenceMathematical optimizationMathematicsEngineeringGeometryMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Simulated bone adaptation is framed as an interface evolution problem. The interface is extracted from a high‐resolution computed tomography (CT) image of trabecular bone microarchitecture and modified by the level set equation. A model and its parameters determine the bone adaptation rate and thus the bone structure at any future time. This study develops an inverse problem and solver to identify model parameters from multiple high‐resolution CT images of bone within the level set framework. We demonstrate the technique on a model of advection and mean curvature flow, termed curvature‐driven adaptation. The inverse solver uses two CT scans to estimate model parameters, which map the bone surface from one image to the next. The solver was tested with synthetic images of bone changing according to the curvature‐driven model with known model parameters. The algorithm recovered known model parameters excellently ( R 2 &gt; .99, p &lt; .001). A grid search indicated that the estimated model parameters were insensitive to hyper‐parameter selection for learning rate 1e −5 5e −5 and gradient scaling factor 5e −5 5e −4 . Finally, we tested the algorithm's sensitivity to salt‐and‐pepper noise of probability , where .0 .9. Model parameter accuracy did not change for &lt; .7, corresponding to Dice coefficients greater than .7. The inverse problem estimates bone adaptation parameters from multiple CT images of changing bone microarchitecture. In the future, this technique could be used to determine participant‐specific bone adaptation parameters in vivo, validate bone adaptation models, and predict bone health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it