TSAGen: Synthetic Time Series Generation for KPI Anomaly Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A key performance indicator (KPI) consists of critical time series data that reflect the runtime states of network systems (e.g., response time and available bandwidth). Despite the importance of KPI, datasets for KPI anomaly detection available to the public are very limited, due to privacy concerns and the high overhead in manually labelling the data. The insufficiency of public KPI data poses a great barrier for network researchers and practitioners to evaluate and test what-if scenarios in the development of artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) and anomaly detection algorithms. To tackle the difficulty, we develop a univariate time series generation tool called TSAGen, which can generate KPI data with anomalies and controllable characteristics for KPI anomaly detection. Experiment results show that the data generated by TSAGen can be used for comprehensive evaluation of anomaly detection algorithms with diverse user-defined what-if scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it