MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3184356897

Global Conference Report: A brief report on the 2020 Canadian Global Oncology Workshop

2021· article· en· W3184356897 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Reanne Booker

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerGlobal healthPandemicMedicineCancer incidenceCause of deathCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Lung cancerDiseaseEnvironmental healthPublic healthOncologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicinePathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of death worldwide, with the World Health Organization (WHO) reporting cancer as the first or second leading cause of death in 112 countries (WHO, 2020a). The American Cancer Society recently published statistics on global cancer, including an estimated incidence of 19.3 million new cancer cases and nearly 10 million deaths due to cancer in 2020 (Sung et al., 2021). Approximately 75% of cancer deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and yet, only 5% of global spending on cancer is directed to LMICs (Praeger et al., 2018). The burden of cancer globally is anticipated to increase, with projections showing that 28.4 million new cases of cancer will occur in 2040 (Sung et al., 2021). The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic has impacted screening, detection, and treatment of cancer, potentially increasing the morbidity and mortality associated with cancer for years to come (Cancino et al., 2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1320.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.415
GPT teacher head0.592
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening→French-language works237,207→