MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184395853 · doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2021.05.007

Feasibility of Coronary Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Previous TAVR

2021· article· en· W3184395853 on OpenAlexaff
Won‐Keun Kim, Costanza Pellegrini, Sebastian Ludwig, Helge Möllmann, Florian Leuschner, Raj Makkar, Juergen Leick, Ignacio J. Amat‐Santos, Oliver Dörr, Philipp Breitbart, Víctor Alfonso Jiménez Díaz, Maciej Dąbrowski, Tanja K. Rudolph, Pablo Avanzas, Jatinderjit Kaur, Stefan Toggweiler, Sebastian Kerber, Patrick Ranosch, Damiano Regazzoli, Derk Frank, Uri Landes, John G. Webb, Marco Barbanti, Paola Purita, Thomas Pilgrim, Branislav Líška, Noriaki Tabata, Tobias Rheude, Moritz Seiffert, Clemens Eckel, Abdelhakim Allali, Roberto Valvo, Sung‐Han Yoon, Nikos Werner, Holger Nef, Yeong‐Hoon Choi, Christian W. Hamm, Jan‐Malte Sinning

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
FundersBoston Scientific CorporationEdwards LifesciencesMedtronicAbbott Laboratories
KeywordsMedicineConventional PCICardiogenic shockCardiologyInternal medicinePercutaneous coronary interventionAcute coronary syndromeArteryRight coronary arteryCoronary artery diseaseStentRevascularizationMyocardial infarctionCoronary angiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJACC: Cardiovascular InterventionsSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207