Large-scale genome-wide association study of food liking reveals genetic determinants and genetic correlations with distinct neurophysiological traits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Variable preferences for different foods are among the main determinants of their intake and are influenced by many factors, including genetics. Despite considerable twins’ heritability, studies aimed at uncovering food-liking genetics have focused mostly on taste receptors. Here, we present the first results of a large-scale genome-wide association study of food liking conducted on 161,625 participants from UK Biobank. Liking was assessed over 139 specific foods using a 9-point hedonic scale. After performing GWAS, we used genetic correlations coupled with structural equation modelling to create a multi-level hierarchical map of food liking. We identified three main dimensions: high caloric foods defined as “Highly palatable”, strong-tasting foods ranging from alcohol to pungent vegetables, defined as “Learned” and finally “Low caloric” foods such as fruit and vegetables. The “Highly palatable” dimension was genetically uncorrelated from the other two, suggesting that two independent processes underlie liking high reward foods and the Learned/Low caloric ones. Genetic correlation analysis with the corresponding food consumption traits revealed a high correlation, while liking showed twice the heritability compared to consumption. For example, fresh fruit liking and consumption showed a genetic correlation of 0.7 with heritabilities of 0.1 and 0.05, respectively. GWAS analysis identified 1401 significant food-liking associations located in 173 genomic loci, with only 11 near taste or olfactory receptors. Genetic correlation with morphological and functional brain data (33,224 UKB participants) uncovers associations of the three food-liking dimensions with non-overlapping, distinct brain areas and networks, suggestive of separate neural mechanisms underlying the liking dimensions. In conclusion, we created a comprehensive and data-driven map of the genetic determinants and associated neurophysiological factors of food liking beyond taste receptor genes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".