MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184422670 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2021.3100333

NOMA for Wireless-Powered Communication Networks With Buffered Sources

2021· article· en· W3184422670 on OpenAlexafffund
Juanjuan Ren, Xianfu Lei, Panagiotis D. Diamantoulakis, Fuhui Zhou, Xiaohu Tang, Octavia A. Dobre

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational ResearchCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSoutheast UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTelecommunications linkComputer scienceWirelessComputer networkDecoding methodsHigh data rateOptimization problemTerm (time)Electronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To increase the feasibility of wireless powered communication networks (WPCNs), the synergy of efficient multiple access protocols and diverse types of resources, e.g., multiple antennas, memories, and energy storage devices is of paramount importance. To this end, in this paper, we introduce the use of buffered sources in WPCNs with uplink non-orthogonal multiple access, in which a multi-antenna hybrid access point can both transmit energy and receive information. The proposed scheme aims at maximizing the long-term utility function, which is determined by the achieved average data rate and fairness among sources. The formulated long-term time-average optimization problem is converted into instantaneous ones by exploiting the Lyapunov optimization framework. The derived analytical solutions reveal the impact of data buffers’ length on the decoding order of sources’ messages. Finally, it is shown that the proposed scheme achieves superior long-term utility compared to the considered baseline schemes with non-buffered sources and buffered sources with orthogonal multiple access. Additionally, it is demonstrated that our proposed scheme can ensure fairness without reducing the average data rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207