‹Cettambre› m. " septembre " (rég. pop., Rouen, 1693) dans les écrits d'Anne Cocqueret et la variation de septembre en français
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this contribution is to evaluate whether writings of the semi literate that belong to communicative distance may add or not to the knowledge of the communicative immediacy (Koch & Oesterreicher 2008: 2575) of the previous times. In order to substantiate this, we examined ‹cettambre›, found in the writings of Anne Cocqueret, a 17th century lower-class woman from Rouen. In parallel, we described septembre and its 'diasystemic' developments. In order to establish both chronologies of the inherited form setembre and the scholarly form septembre, we particularly relied on the oral variant [sektabr], as it is listed in many modern French dialects, in varieties of French located in Belgium, Quebec, Ontario, Acadia, Louisiana, as well as in Caribbean and Indian Ocean Creoles. Our conclusion consists of a discussion of the norms that are observed by the semi literate and of their writings' value in the study of the communicative immediacy of the previous times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".