Seismic Behaviour of High-Rise Buildings with Transfer Floors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comparative analytical study for the seismic response of high-rise buildings with transfer floors is presented. A number of prototype models were analyzed using elastic linear response spectrum and inelastic nonlinear time history techniques using three-dimensional finite element models. The analyzed models had different transfer floor system: transfer slabs and transfer girders. The vertical position of the transfer system with respect to the building height was investigated. Global seismic response of the buildings such as storey shear and bending moment distribution, and inter-storey drift were numerically evaluated. The results showed the localization of damage in the vicinity of the transfer floor in addition to the first floor; the location of the transfer floor influenced the global seismic response of the structure. The numerical analysis revealed that the transfer girders system is a competitive alternative to the slab system in terms of reducing the seismic weights as well as the material cost with a slight change in the global seismic behaviour of the building. Transfer girders system is more flexible compared to slab system and generate lower straining actions on the structural vertical elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it