Modeling of ExB effects on tungsten re-deposition and transport in the DIII-D divertor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mixed-material DIVIMP–WallDYN modeling, now incorporating ExB drifts, is presented that simultaneously reproduces tungsten (W) erosion and deposition patterns observed during the DIII-D metal rings campaign, in which a toroidally symmetric set of W-coated tiles were installed in the carbon (C) DIII-D divertor. Since most reactor plasma facing component (PFC) designs call for mixed-material environments, including ITER's W/Be environment, the divertor targets will quickly evolve into reconstituted surfaces of multiple elements. This work identifies controlling physics that affects material migration patterns in the divertor, which impact PFC lifetimes and impurity leakage from the divertor to the core. These simulations indicate that radial and poloidal ExB transport dominates over parallel force balance for high-Z impurities such as W in the divertor region of DIII-D. It is demonstrated that ExB drifts are required to reproduce the experimental observation of non-local W and C co-accumulation in a band ∼7–9 cm outboard of the outer-strike-point (OSP) W source, for attached L-mode conditions in the unfavorable ion grad- B drift direction. In addition, W gross erosion is localized to the region outboard of the OSP, as the formation of C co-deposits suppresses W erosion at the strike point. Time-dependent simulations with scaled ExB impurity drifts (60% of the OEDGE-calculated drift velocity) and W re-erosion quantitatively reproduce these features, including depth-resolved W/C ratios, within a factor of 2 over ∼115 s of accumulated plasma exposure. The location of co-deposition regions is shown to be well-represented by an analytic leakage model, driven largely by poloidal ExB drifts. Qualitative agreement is also found between campaign-integrated W deposition measurements and simulations for the favorable ion grad- B drift direction, the standard mode of operation for most tokamaks. These results imply that a long-term inward radial migration of material from the outer divertor through the private flux region may occur in future devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".