Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente artículo busca despertar curiosidad académica sobre uno de los principales problemas que enfrentan los distintos actores que conforman la industria de los hidrocarburos : su coexistencia con los distintos roles y funciones del Estado-Anfitrión en el negocio petrolero y gasífero, y sobre la relevancia de la interpretación y aplicación de normas jurídicas a la anterior coexistencia en controversias y/o discrepancias nacionales e internacionales, en particular, cuando son estudiadas y analizadas bajo los principios propios de los principales sistemas jurídicos del mundo. Lo anterior ha llevado, en la práctica, a análisis e interpretaciones de instituciones jurídicas conformes al sistema de Derecho Civil, pero bajo la óptica y análisis de conceptos e instituciones propios del Derecho Común (y/o viceversa), como sería, por ejemplo, el caso de la coexistencia del principio de supremacía del interés colectivo y el principio de autonomía de la voluntad de las partes sobre el desarrollo de los negocios de la industria de los hidrocarburos
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".