MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184598308 · doi:10.3390/app11146522

Privacy Preserving Face Recognition in Cloud Robotics: A Comparative Study

2021· article· en· W3184598308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingFacial recognition systemEncryptionArtificial intelligenceRobotCryptographyRoboticsServerTask (project management)Computer securityComputer visionMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Computer networkOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time robotic applications encounter the robot on board resources’ limitations. The speed of robot face recognition can be improved by incorporating cloud technology. However, the transmission of data to the cloud servers exposes the data to security and privacy attacks. Therefore, encryption algorithms need to be set up. This paper aims to study the security and performance of potential encryption algorithms and their impact on the deep-learning-based face recognition task’s accuracy. To this end, experiments are conducted for robot face recognition through various deep learning algorithms after encrypting the images of the ORL database using cryptography and image-processing based algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it