A Radiotracer for Molecular Imaging and Therapy of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor–Positive Prostate Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is overexpressed in many solid malignancies, particularly in prostate and breast cancers, among others. We synthesized ProBOMB2, a novel bombesin derivative radiolabeled with 68Ga and 177Lu, and evaluated its ability to target GRPR in a preclinical model of human prostate cancer. Methods: ProBOMB2 was synthesized in solid phase using fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chemistry. The chelator 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid was coupled to the N terminus and separated from the GRPR-targeting sequence by a cationic 4-amino-(1-carboxymethyl)-piperidine spacer. Binding affinity for both human and murine GRPR was determined using a cell-based competition assay, whereas a calcium efflux assay was used to measure the agonist and antagonist properties of the derivatives. ProBOMB2 was radiolabeled with 177Lu and 68Ga. SPECT and PET imaging and biodistribution studies were conducted using male immunocompromised mice bearing GRPR-positive PC-3 human prostate cancer xenografts. Results: Ga-ProBOMB2 and Lu-ProBOMB2 bound to PC-3 cells with an inhibition constant of 4.58 ± 0.67 and 7.29 ± 1.73 nM, respectively. 68Ga-ProBOMB2 and 177Lu-ProBOMB2 were radiolabeled with a radiochemical purity greater than 95%. Both radiotracers were excreted primarily via the renal pathway. PET images of PC-3 tumor xenografts were visualized with excellent contrast at 1 and 2 h after injection with 68Ga-ProBOMB2, and there was very low off-target organ accumulation. 177Lu-ProBOMB2 enabled clear visualization of PC-3 tumor xenografts by SPECT imaging at 1, 4, and 24 h after injection 177Lu-ProBOMB2 displayed higher tumor uptake than 68Ga-ProBOMB2 at 1 h after injection. 177Lu-ProBOMB2 tumor uptake at 1, 4, and 24 h after injection was 14.9 ± 3.1, 4.8 ± 2.1, and 1.7 ± 0.3 percentage injected dose per gram of tissue, respectively. Conclusion:68Ga-ProBOMB2 and 177Lu-ProBOMB2 are promising radiotracers with limited pancreas uptake, good tumor uptake, and favorable pharmacokinetics for imaging and therapy of GRPR-expressing tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".