MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184642905 · doi:10.52086/001c.25676

Seven ways to fate and all

2018· article· en· W3184642905 on OpenAlexaff
Bryan Wade

Bibliographic record

VenueTEXT · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Therapy and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrisonHeroinAddictionCharacter (mathematics)Meaning (existential)Scripting languagePsychologyMedia studiesPsychoanalysisCriminologySociologyPsychiatryPsychotherapistDrug

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This script is the outcome of a practice-led research project exploring the exponential growth in British Columbia of fentanyl-detected illicit drug overdose deaths. A September 2017 summary from The BC Coroners Service’s confirms a 143% increase in the number of deaths. In the canon of dramatic screenplays, few scripts explore the domain of drug addiction exclusively as a subject. In The Man with the Golden Arm (1955), Frank Sinatra plays Frankie Machine, a drug addict who becomes clean in prison and yearns to be a drummer. Yet, his heroin addiction is never specified. In Clean and Sober (1988) Michael Keaton is an alcoholic and cocaine addicted realtor who hides in a treatment center. However, in the recent, Emmy Award winning television series, Breaking Bad , Walter White’s sidekick, Jesse Pinkham, is clearly a heroin addict. My screenplay differs from the above dramas in that most characters are not confirmed addicts. In my dramatized script I portray characters from many walks of life: teenagers, parents, actors, politicians, and the homeless, and show how they struggle with the impact of illicit drug usage. It can happen to anyone. As a character states in Way Five, “It (meaning addiction) is a health issue.” Rather than a screed about illicit opioid use, my screenplay attempts to inform, open conversations and transform attitudes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0100.017
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTEXTSame topicArt Therapy and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207