MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184654012 · doi:10.37440/soclaw.2020.01.03

ЗНАЧЕННЯ СТАНДАРТІВ МІЖНАРОДНОЇ ОРГАНІЗАЦІЇ ПРАЦІ ДЛЯ НАЦІОНАЛЬНОГО ТРУДОВОГО ПРАВА

2020· article· uk· W3184654012 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeKNUTSHIR · 2020
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Social Development in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationLabour lawInternational lawPolitical scienceLegislatureState (computer science)LawFreedom of associationState responsibilityConventionHuman rights

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to the study of impact of the standards of the International Labour Organization on the labour law of Ukraine. It is noted that the conventions and recommendations of the International Labour Organization play a significant role in the implementation and development of national labour law. This is due to the recognition at the constitutional level of international treaties as a part of the national legislation, as well as, the membership of our state since 1954 in the International Labour Organization.The central legislative act in the field of labour – the Labour Code of Ukraine is the actual reflection of the ratified conventions of the International Labour Organization. As of 2020, Ukraine has ratified 71 conventions, including 8 fundamental and 4 priority conventions. Thereby, the Code, despite its almost 50-year history, still continues to be relevant in the regulation of employment relationships in Ukraine. In addition, the phenomenon of the acts of the International Labour Organization is the precise fulfillment by the ILO member state of its obligations, combined with the actual absence of responsibility for non-compliance. At the same time, the consequences of violations of international labour law indirectly depend on the existing control mechanisms used by the ILO. In fact, there are two such mechanisms: general and special. It should also be noted that the implementation of ILO conventions can be provided for by the provisions of various international treaties to which the Ukraine is a party. Among these international treaties are Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement and Association Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine.It is concluded that the impact of the standards of the International Labour Organization on the labour law of Ukraine is characterized by both internal and external manifestations. Thus, the ILO conventions ratified by Ukraine, being already tested in practice and unified norms, serve as a reliable foundation for the formation and development of national labour law. In turn, strict observance of the obligations assumed under these conventions, as well as the subsequent ratification of modern conventions, in addition to promoting the effective implementation of labour relations, also positively affects the international image of Ukraine as a socially oriented state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it