Redesigning an antibody H3 loop by virtual screening of a small library of human germline-derived sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The design of superior biologic therapeutics, including antibodies and engineered proteins, involves optimizing their specific ability to bind to disease-related molecular targets. Previously, we developed and applied the Assisted Design of Antibody and Protein Therapeutics (ADAPT) platform for virtual affinity maturation of antibodies (Vivcharuk et al. in PLoS One 12(7):e0181490, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181490 , 2017). However, ADAPT is limited to point mutations of hot-spot residues in existing CDR loops. In this study, we explore the possibility of wholesale replacement of the entire H3 loop with no restriction to maintain the parental loop length. This complements other currently published studies that sample replacements for the CDR loops L1, L2, L3, H1 and H2. Given the immense sequence space theoretically available to H3, we focused on the virtual grafting of over 5000 human germline-derived H3 sequences from the IGMT/LIGM database increasing the diversity of the sequence space when compared to using crystalized H3 loop sequences. H3 loop conformations are generated and scored to identify optimized H3 sequences. Experimental testing of high-ranking H3 sequences grafted into the framework of the bH1 antibody against human VEGF-A led to the discovery of multiple hits, some of which had similar or better affinities relative to the parental antibody. In over 75% of the tested designs, the re-designed H3 loop contributed favorably to overall binding affinity. The hits also demonstrated good developability attributes such as high thermal stability and no aggregation. Crystal structures of select re-designed H3 variants were solved and indicated that although some deviations from predicted structures were seen in the more solvent accessible regions of the H3 loop, they did not significantly affect predicted affinity scores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".