MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184661915 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a7239

Dual-Layer Spectral CT Imaging of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer: Analysis of Spectral Imaging Parameters and Impact on Tumor Staging

2021· article· en· W3184661915 on OpenAlexaff
Charlie Hsu, C. Jeavon, Igor Fomin, Lê Thi Huong Dû, Craig Buchan, Trevor Watkins, Y. Nae, Nicholas McKay Parry, Richard I. Aviv

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIodineNuclear medicineHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaReceiver operating characteristicHead and neck cancerSpectral imagingHead and neckCarcinomaCancerRadiologyPathologyInternal medicineChemistryOpticsSurgeryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:</h3> Dual-layer spectral CT is a novel technology that utilized conventional single-tube CT acquisition with a dual-layer detector for the separation of high and low-energy photons to create spectral data for material decomposition. We evaluated the spectral parameters of iodine density and Z-effective values in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and determined its impact on local tumor staging. <h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS:</h3> Twenty-one patients with primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and 15 healthy controls were retrospectively evaluated. Iodine density (milligram/milliliter) and Z-effective values were compared quantitatively between head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and normal neck mucosa. The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve determined the diagnostic performance of the spectral data for local staging. We compared conventional CT images without and with iodine density and Z-effective images to determine its impact on local tumor staging. <h3>RESULTS:</h3> Primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma showed higher mean iodine density (2.01 [SD, 0.26] mg/mL, <i>P </i>&lt; .001) and Z-effective values (8.21 [SD, 0.36], <i>P </i>&lt; .001). A high interobserver correlation was demonstrated for ROI measurements for both the control group (iodine density, κ = 0.71, and Z-effective values, κ = 0.78) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (iodine density, κ = 0.84, and Z-effective values, κ = 0.75) group. The area under the curve for iodine density and Z-effective values was 0.98 and 0.93, respectively. Optimal thresholds were identified as 1.58 mg/mL (95% CI, 1.45–1.71 mg/mL; <i>P </i>&lt; .001; sensitivity = 1.0; specificity = .0.93) for iodine density and 8.08 (95% CI, 7.96–8.19; <i>P </i>&lt; .001; sensitivity = 0.86; specificity = 0.93) for Z-effective values. Conventional CT with the addition of dual-layer spectral data (iodine density and Z-effective values) improved the accuracy of local tumor staging in 3 of 21 patients (14%) with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared with the criterion standard surgical staging/histopathology. <h3>CONCLUSIONS:</h3> Dual-layer spectral iodine density and Z-effective values provided increased quantitative and qualitative differentiation between upper aerodigestive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and normal mucosa. Increased tissue differentiation improved the local tumor staging accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NeuroradiologySame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207