MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184699110

CONCEPTIONS OF DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP FORMING IN THE SYSTEM OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION OF CANADA

2018· article· en· W3184699110 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Volodymyr Pogrebnyak

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Cherkasy Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University. Series "Pedagogical Sciences" · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianCitizenshipDemocracyContext (archaeology)Political scienceState (computer science)Active citizenshipNormativeSociologyPublic administrationDoctrinePedagogyLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Citizenship education of young people, their active bringing to participating in state-creative and public processes are the leading tasks of the educational system in the conditions of present time. It is thereon marked in the National Programme of Patriotic Education, National Doctrine of Development of Education in Ukraine, in the National Strategy of Development of Education in Ukraine on a period till 2021, the Laws of Ukraine « About Education » and « About Higher Education » , other native normative pedagogical documents. In the context of the world integration processes, European choice and development of the state system in Ukraine realization of democratic principles of citizen society in the educational process of general and higher school in the conditions of updating of Ukrainian society and presentation of public activity acquires major actuality. Purpose. In the setting of the outlined scientific and practical research directions it is decided to carry out the comparative pedagogical analysis of conceptions of democratic citizenship forming in the system of the higher education of Canada with intention of establishment of the leading conceptual approaches to its realization as means of development of democratic state and the higher education in Ukraine . Methods. Theoretical formal logical and pedagogical comparative analyses of various aspects of the problem, the axiomatic method, the deductive method, descent from abstract to concrete. Results. The conducted research allowed drawing conclusion, that preparation of a citizen in the widest understanding is one of the leading tasks of the modern system of public education in Canada. Inconsistencies of approaches to citizenship education and debates on existent conceptions of democratic citizenship are predefined by (1) internal complication, (2) normative character and (3) absence of unity in interpretation of terminology. Present conceptions are differentiated, primarily, by degree of citizen participation in public life, and are grouped in elite, populist and transitional varieties. At the same time, the main tendency of pedagogical researches of essence of democratic citizenship in Canada can be categorised as transition from declaration of simple awareness of citizens about their own rights and duties and partiality for the ideals of democracy to stimulation of the initiative contributing in community and society life . Originality. The comparative pedagogical analysis of conceptions of democratic citizenship forming in the system of the higher education of Canada has been carried out for the first time in the Ukrainian pedagogical science . Contradictions and debatable aspects of present conceptions of democratic citizenship forming in the system of the higher education of Canada have been exposed; the progress of the most important pedagogical theory trends in this sphere of education is determined. Conclusions. Introducing conceptual principles and tendencies in development of democratic citizenship of specialists, which have been found out in Canadian experience, into the pedagogical process of their training in Ukraine will assist realization of democratic values of citizen social order in educational activity of the higher school in conditions of renovation and increasing public activity of Ukrainian society. Determination and comparison of significant descriptions of distinct conceptions of democratic citizenship education, which have been implemented practically in the Canadian system of the higher education, is a perspective direction of subsequent scientific research of the problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Cherkasy Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University. Series "Pedagogical Sciences"Same topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207