MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Artificial Intelligence Based Fault Monitoring of Power Trains: Design & Implementation

2021· article· en· W3184756284 on OpenAlexaff
Lingli Gong, Anshuman Sharma, Mohammad Abdul Bhuiya, Hilmy Awad, Mohamed Z. Youssef

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrainFault (geology)Computer sciencePropulsionCluster analysisVoltageFault detection and isolationSIGNAL (programming language)Power (physics)Condition monitoringEngineeringControl engineeringElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to diagnose the electric vehicle’s propulsion operational conditions, an on-board health monitoring system (HMS), is necessarily proposed. For the purpose of providing many fault conditions of voltage source inverters with a reliable, efficient and simple fault detection, a proposed technique is demonstrated in this paper. The full diagnostic system oversees the whole vehicle. Based on blende clustering with artificial intelligence method, which compares the actual VSI output voltage with the reference gate-driving signal. Simulation and laboratory prototype results are presented to validate the proposed methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207