MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3184776093 · doi:10.1128/mbio.01077-21

Interplay between Nucleoid-Associated Proteins and Transcription Factors in Controlling Specialized Metabolism in <i>Streptomyces</i>

2021· article· en· W3184776093 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiafei Zhang, Sara N. Andres, Marie A. Elliot

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsNucleoidTranscription (linguistics)Transcription factorStreptomycesBiologyComputational biologyCell biologyGeneticsMicrobiologyBacteriaGeneEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

are the source of many clinically prescribed antibiotics. However, many clusters are not expressed in the laboratory due to repression by the nucleoid-associated protein Lsr2. Understanding how Lsr2 represses cluster expression, and how repression can be alleviated, is key to accessing the metabolic potential of these bacteria. Using the chloramphenicol biosynthetic cluster from Streptomyces venezuelae as a model, we explored the mechanistic basis underlying Lsr2-mediated repression, and activation by the pathway-specific regulator CmlR. Lsr2 polymerized along the chromosome and bridged binding sites located within and outside the cluster, promoting repression. Conversely, CmlR was essential for chloramphenicol production and further functioned to countersilence Lsr2 repression by recruiting RNA polymerase and promoting transcription, ultimately removing Lsr2 polymers from the chromosome. Manipulating the activity of both regulators led to a >130× increase in chloramphenicol levels, suggesting that combinatorial regulatory strategies can be powerful tools for maximizing natural product yields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207