The results of knee arthrodesis with dedicated modular intramedullary nail as a limb salvage procedure in infection complications of knee arthroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. Complications after arthroplasty often result in irreversible disability. In some cases, for the extremity to be salvaged, permanent knee joint arthrodesis is a last-chance procedure. Modular implant design simplifies surgical technique and knee arthrodesis without bone-on-bone contact, immediately provides full weight bearing and restores limb length and alignment. Puropose. The aim of this article was to perform a clinical evaluation of patients after knee arthrodesis with a dedicated modular intramedullary nail without bone-on-bone contact after a failed infected total knee arthroplasty. Methods. Between 2017 and 2021, 17 patients were treated with knee arthrodesis with a modular nail after a septic complication of total knee arthroplasty. Clinical evaluation of 15 patients was obtained during a follow-up visit, including: the pain severity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), physical function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Score, gait independence, and the shortening of the affected limb in relation to the other one. Results. The mean follow-up duration was 1.4 years. The group included 11 women and 4 men with an average of 69.3 (57–84) years. All nails were cemented. There was one recurrence of infection. The mean VAS pain score was 2.73, also 4 patients felt no pain at all. The average functional score on the WOMAC scale was 36.4 (14–60) and for the Oxford Knee Score was 26.5 (15–41). Each patient achieved an independent gait. All patients reported the necessity of use of crutches outside home. The average limb shortening was 2.05 cm (0.5–3.0). In addition, 14 of the 15 patients positively evaluated the procedure results and if they had to, they would again decide on this form of treatment. During follow-up, no complication or problems with implants used were observed. Conclusions. Knee arthrodesis with modular nail offers an acceptable functional result and gives a chance of salvaging a limb in complex septic complications of TKA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".