ReSVA: A MATLAB method to co-register and mosaic airborne video-based remotely sensed data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Airborne remotely sensed data (e.g. hyperspectral imagery, thermal videography, full frame RGB photography) often requires post-processing to be combined into a series of images or a mosaic for analysis. This is generally accomplished through the use of position and attitude hardware (i.e. Global Navigation Satellite System - GNSS / Inertial Measurement Unit - IMU) in combination with specialized software. Occasionally, hardware failure in the GNSS/IMU instrumentation occurs, however the data are still recoverable through a correction process, which allows image registration to mosaic the data. Here we present a simple and flexible MATLAB® code package that has been developed to combine video-based remotely sensed data. It first applies an iterative image registration process to align all frames, using pre-existing GPS information if supplied by the user, and then grids the frame data together to develop a final, single mosaic dataset that can be used for analysis. An example of this method using airborne infrared video data of a wildfire is shown as a demonstration. MATLAB functions are easily adaptable to specific user needs and datasets. The method outputs the combined data and positional information in three separate MATLAB variables that can be readily used for analysis in MATLAB or exported for use in other software.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".